<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annotated 22-22</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-22/</link>
	<description>The Saga of the Working Class Adventurer - New comics every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 05:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.29</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak McKracken</title>
		<link>http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-22/comment-page-1/#comment-1458069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak McKracken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildedage.net/?post_type=comic&#038;p=12745#comment-1458069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I had not seen those ... although the steps are going in the wrong direction ... 

... but I just had a look at the gate during construction:
http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-4/
and that looks solid to me. There&#039;s retentions in all directions alright! And not just that, but the base of the gate extends far enough that even during construction, the lower blocks would probably not tip over while the next remaining blocks are stacked on them. It may or may not be physically accurate, but this is good enough for me.

Impressive level of planning, John! That is way beyond what I expected!
(but that doesn&#039;t preclude some more internal geometry which can prevent the stones from sliding out]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I had not seen those &#8230; although the steps are going in the wrong direction &#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; but I just had a look at the gate during construction:<br />
<a href="http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-4/" rel="nofollow">http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-4/</a><br />
and that looks solid to me. There&#8217;s retentions in all directions alright! And not just that, but the base of the gate extends far enough that even during construction, the lower blocks would probably not tip over while the next remaining blocks are stacked on them. It may or may not be physically accurate, but this is good enough for me.</p>
<p>Impressive level of planning, John! That is way beyond what I expected!<br />
(but that doesn&#8217;t preclude some more internal geometry which can prevent the stones from sliding out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak McKracken</title>
		<link>http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-22/comment-page-1/#comment-1458065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak McKracken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 21:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildedage.net/?post_type=comic&#038;p=12745#comment-1458065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upper half can be stable with flat faces between the stones, (as long as the bottom stones are held in place) but the lower half cannot stay in place in this way

Each stone has its own weight pulling it down, and whatever forces its neighbours are exerting on it. Since there&#039;s an angle between the stone&#039;s lateral faces, the pressure from its neighbours is pushing it out of the circle. On the upper half, that is counteracted by the stones&#039; own weight. On the lower half, the weight of each stone is also pushing it outwards, so it&#039;s not going to work.

As John correctly says, of course: If the faces are not plain or are prevented in some other way (braces in the back?) from sliding off each other, it could still be made to work, although it&#039;s not an efficient structure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The upper half can be stable with flat faces between the stones, (as long as the bottom stones are held in place) but the lower half cannot stay in place in this way</p>
<p>Each stone has its own weight pulling it down, and whatever forces its neighbours are exerting on it. Since there&#8217;s an angle between the stone&#8217;s lateral faces, the pressure from its neighbours is pushing it out of the circle. On the upper half, that is counteracted by the stones&#8217; own weight. On the lower half, the weight of each stone is also pushing it outwards, so it&#8217;s not going to work.</p>
<p>As John correctly says, of course: If the faces are not plain or are prevented in some other way (braces in the back?) from sliding off each other, it could still be made to work, although it&#8217;s not an efficient structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TachyonCode</title>
		<link>http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-22/comment-page-1/#comment-1440335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TachyonCode]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildedage.net/?post_type=comic&#038;p=12745#comment-1440335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s easy to miss because the *interior* of the ring doesn&#039;t show them. And if they are interlocking, those slots should be visible on the inside, too. Unless my geometric intuition is underdeveloped, there is no reasonable way they could have assembled the gate by pushing the individual blocks outward from the space at its interior; at bare minimum such an object needs the slots to be present on the inside surface, and be assembled from without - or you&#039;ll have collisions between unintended surfaces as you try to assemble it.

I&#039;m going to assume that, like the torches that are being shown in silhouette, there&#039;s a stylistic reduction of detail for objects that aren&#039;t the scene&#039;s intended focus, and that&#039;s a contributing factor in why we aren&#039;t seeing them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy to miss because the *interior* of the ring doesn&#8217;t show them. And if they are interlocking, those slots should be visible on the inside, too. Unless my geometric intuition is underdeveloped, there is no reasonable way they could have assembled the gate by pushing the individual blocks outward from the space at its interior; at bare minimum such an object needs the slots to be present on the inside surface, and be assembled from without &#8211; or you&#8217;ll have collisions between unintended surfaces as you try to assemble it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to assume that, like the torches that are being shown in silhouette, there&#8217;s a stylistic reduction of detail for objects that aren&#8217;t the scene&#8217;s intended focus, and that&#8217;s a contributing factor in why we aren&#8217;t seeing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TachyonCode</title>
		<link>http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-22/comment-page-1/#comment-1440332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TachyonCode]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildedage.net/?post_type=comic&#038;p=12745#comment-1440332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be fair (and nitpick a little), Sustainable is one of the few meaningful terms among that mess. It just doesn&#039;t mean much to industry, since industry is largely not a thing that can be described as sustainable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair (and nitpick a little), Sustainable is one of the few meaningful terms among that mess. It just doesn&#8217;t mean much to industry, since industry is largely not a thing that can be described as sustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keiranhalcyon31</title>
		<link>http://guildedage.net/comic/annotated-22-22/comment-page-1/#comment-1439984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiranhalcyon31]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 07:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildedage.net/?post_type=comic&#038;p=12745#comment-1439984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;squints&lt;/i&gt; Holy crap on a cracker, there are interlocking slots actually visible!  Without your specific mention of it, even with John&#039;s comment above, I missed it.  Thanks for pointing it out, and John, I stand wholly corrected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>squints</i> Holy crap on a cracker, there are interlocking slots actually visible!  Without your specific mention of it, even with John&#8217;s comment above, I missed it.  Thanks for pointing it out, and John, I stand wholly corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
