Comments on: Chapter 22 – Page 18

By: SotiCoto

SotiCoto — Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:50:07 +0000

“We should automatically reject any preconceptions about what we should or shouldn’t do based on an absence of obligation… except maybe this one!”

By: Observer

Observer — Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:21:29 +0000

Typo error.

In the fourth panel.

“signing” All the context suggest this word should be “singing”.

I can’t see how this is a joke or pun and it wouldn’t fly in this type of dialogue anyway so I assume this is a true typo.

Don’t know why it wasn’t caught at the time or if anybody is listening but if it isn’t too late to bother there you go.

By: death

death — Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:11:28 +0000

EAT ALL THE THINGS!!

By: SotiCoto

SotiCoto — Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:11:48 +0000

Roughly speaking, such novelty human values as “beauty” and “worth” generally correlate with rarity… i.e. susceptibility to nonexistence, both in the physical and chronological sense.
Something which is short lived and of low number is considered more “beautiful” and more “valuable” than an equivalent generic, common object which lasts pretty much forever and is tougher than 3-week-old toast.

For all intents and purposes that means something will be appreciated more within a given moment of time if it is killed… than if it is allowed to continue existing… and effectively that the best way to optimise beauty in the world is to wreck the fuck out of it.

That said, this is somewhat of a misdirected way of considering it.
Attention is drawn to change much as attention deviates from stasis (or rather familiarity with said stasis). Simple survival mechanism.
Destruction is pretty much the ur-example of change, and one might say one thing cannot become another without the first being “destroyed” in the process and the latter not having existed in the first place… (but that again is because of the delusion of “things”… of identifying collections of matters as integers or whatever).

I think I had other things to say… ah well, fuck it…. dun care any more.

… One of the joys (being a tad facetious) of being a Nihilist is that when I lose interest in blathering about something, I will just drop it and go do something else. No obligations, no problem, amirite?

By: SotiCoto

SotiCoto — Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:59:23 +0000

One man’s hero is another’s nuisance.
All baryonic matter in the Universe pretty much falls into the error-margins. i.e. The Universe is a big empty void…… give or take a few irrelevant specks here and there.

The tiny little planet with all the noise and puffed up “life” on it all full of itself doesn’t even feature in the extended description. What is it even trying to do? Why does this planet have a rare skin-condition that it could clean up so easily, if not just due to poor hygiene?