Comments on: Chapter 7 – Page 2

By: zack of hiskatana

zack of hiskatana — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:47:25 +0000

those words describe me perfectly.
that is why frigg is ma gurrl.

By: zack of hiskatana

zack of hiskatana — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:44:53 +0000

meh. a few more level ups and a quick class change could fix that.

By: RachelxReverie

RachelxReverie — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:54:32 +0000

Where exactly did Frigg and Syr disappear to?? ;D

By: Nekropancser

Nekropancser — Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:06:51 +0000

I don’t know, if anyone would hear me, but hey… about the Righteousness and golden aura of Frigg… In thruth, proud and pure people are somehow golden in my heart. This is what Gravedust must have meant. This purity could come from many sources and they are not related to socially accepted terms as good, evil, or troublemaker or such… I saw a man, Christian in his whole, and he burned golden. I saw a man, never accepting the laws, always being on the low, pagan to the end, burning golden. Purity is peace with self, and Frigg is in peace with herself… at least mostly. I believe this is her purity. Though I have to contradict my own words, since, I saw men attuned with their inner selves, still, they were giving in to their animalistic instincts, but defiled by our modern societies customs. These men were in peace with themselves through lies, and they lacked that glow. Instead they were a constant resonance… like a threat untriggered. “Alignments” cannot be described with nine base alignments, people are more complex than that.
In DnD3rd Ed, we used to interpret alignments in context of the character’s personalities, therefore always customizing them. In our read, Good were selflessness, Evil were cruelty, Law were stubbornness, and Chaos were utter freedom. Though always blended, mixed together. I believe, that it was intended to be something like this, not a set of rules to define nine playable personalities.

By: The Indomitable Eric

The Indomitable Eric — Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:27:14 +0000

Yeah, in 3.x those examples might be lawful. The determining factor is how many of those codes they have; dwarf rubbing might not be enough to tip the scale from neutral to lawful, but dwarf rubbing, gnome kissing, and nose picking might.

In 3.x, I’d say the Sheriff is probably more neutral evil than lawful, if only because he only employs the laws of the land at his convenience, not universally.

I think the difference is that 2e sees ‘THE law of the land’ and 3e sees ‘A law of the land.’